>>40414005If you say so. If the situation was reversed, you really wouldn't want "straight-baiting".
Though, it already happens with the gender percentage when people call it out with "he" or "she".
>Consider the following: >Gardevoir has a "feminine styled features", yet its 50/50 gender split. >Primarina is another example, 87.5/12.5 split, yet it has "feminine features". And people goto great lengths saying "she".
>Glaceon is another one 87.5/12.5 split>Gou BTFO outta people when he was found to be male.>Sylveon, how could I forget? It has people literally going to ends about it is well.And many more gender arguments exist.
The same reasons you'll see people get mad and say "he" or "she", is the
same things that are happening here. It's really ironic if you think about it.
When people deny your reality (not intentionally of course, it's their favourite) with "he" or "she", even with the gender percentage. You'll still get mad. Or you'll post your love saying I love "her" or "him" and people will still get into heated shit-flinging over this, because one has more percentage over the other.
It's one thing to capture an specific audience for the sake of making extra money.
But it's another for not implementing a system to properly cater for everyone.
It doesnt really matter what side of the fence you're on. Even if you hate one side, if the
other says its their, you'll pick it up and scream "It's my fence!"
