>>40476112Its one of the most inconsequential, pointless, and unremarkable Pokemon and since dexcut defenders can only qualify their defense by appeals to the subjective it became emblematic of the weakest argument in the debate, which is to say 'your favourite shitmon is being precluded and that's why your mad, therefore your argument - by virtue of subjectivity - is invalid.' Its a fallacious position to that but one that is cognitively easiest for dexcut defenders to parrott.
I love Stantler and hope he's in anyway.