>>40495610Better, even if it's simple. Post more replies like this next time. Be more intent about the spiritual aspect of what you desire and *who* you desire.
>>40495642You have it half right but you're too broken by being a trainer, ESL-kun. Binding slaves to herself (or even specifically her ankles) as she travels the cosmos to search for more light amidst the endless darkness to consume isn't inherently a bad fantasy, but you're involving the orgasm denial aspects because it stimulates specifically your own genitalia. You're being dishonest with yourself and with us because even though you're assuming that it's sexually gratifying to want to do the thing when you aren't allowed to do the thing, you keep forgetting that *you aren't allowed to do the thing*. It's not something that they're going to enjoy, anon! Do you lustfully, eagerly talk about having to scrub out your bathtub until it's sparkling clean? No, right? So why do you longingly talk about orgasm denial like this? The answer to that, of course, is because you're aroused by it in an inherently paradoxical way! So for the sake of the Divine you speak of, stop lying to everyone and focus on the less sexual aspects of the dominance you apparently seek.
