>>40489256So far I've seen about as much content in the trailers for this game than in the trailers for any previous game. Logically I can conclude that it has about as much content, and yet it costs 50% more. As a consumer I don't like this so I don't buy the game. I'm not 'boycotting' it, I'm just not buying it because it doesn't look like it's worth my time or money. I'm also not buying Garfield Kart or Bee Simulator because I've got a huge backlog of video games that are more worth my time than any of them.
Showing off your features is not 'spoiling the game', it's telling people what they're buying. I'm not saying they should tell me who the final boss is or what the plot twist is, I just want to know what those extra $20 are getting me. Maybe later, when the reviews come out, I'll change my mind and get it second-hand, but if GF wanted my money they should've provided a more convincing argument.
>>40489302>maractus and ferrothorn are equally viable>>40489393OP is literally some shill telling people only poor people don't buy overpriced garbage (which is false because they absolutely do).
