>>40512014If that's the case why do 6/8 DO look exactly like the animal they supposedly represent
It's not even 2 gens in a row where the outlier pops up (2/6) so
Why? if they followed the theory past gen 2 then either 3/4/5 would all be based only tangentially in the animal they represent
And if they decided to use Gen 3 as the starting point, why the fuck would fennekin exist?
Charizard is NOT a dragon, regardless of mega, just like Absol isn't a conniving, backstabbing, two bit thief
His name comes from "lizard"
If they wanted to make the dragon allusion his name would be "Lizargon"
Also, if Charizard who is a lizard "meant to evoke a dragon" counted as a dragon
Then why is Fennekin, who goes Magical Girl > old Wizard meant to count as a fucking dog and not a wizard?
Also if Cyndaquil's name is counted (Ignoring the whole rodent tail thing for your sake) why the fuck is Litten counted, his name is Nyabby AKA "Nyan" And "Tabby"
What theoryfags are doing is counting just the 1 member of each family as valid, and ignoring everything else
The only ones that fit the criteria the most are
Blaziken/Infernape/Emboar
So if anything the theory should be
>FIRE/FIGHTING starters are based on the zodiacAnd if that's the case then 3/8 is such a shit point that the theory falls apart anyway
