>>40534738That's not what I said at all. I was just saying they would reasonably be expecting less especially in that region so stocking less wouldn't worry them. especially since it would look good in articles.
There's a difference between intentionally shorting stock and not particularly worrying if it's short you mental invalid.
Also, I fucked up with the post number but in
>>40534721 I pointed out why it didn't even matter. They weren't talking about games anyway which is what I thought they meant.
In actual fact knowing it's merch at a limited time location (at least it was last I heard) makes it even more worthless to know.
