>>40543962There is an easy reason for that. Regardless of how "nice" the game is, removal of past pokemon for any reason means this game is far worse than any other pokemon game.
>New pokemon will be in it.Doesn't matter, older games did this and were able to include all pokemon from previous generations.
>Look at all the shiny new stuff, (open world, Dynamaxing and Gigantamaxing, curry)Wow, it is like they are actively trying to distract from the fact that they will have less pokemon in a pokemon game.
>It was for balance, or you won't miss that stantler, or some other nonsenseThat isn't the point, I know my favorite pokemon are in, but when do they have to go for the sake of "Balance"? I back this game, I should be prepared for that reality.
>For all of the shiny new features, we can easily prove that most of them are very badly implemented.Yeah, that speaks for itself. If you know what you are doing this game shouldn't take long, and I hope you enjoy paying alot more for alot less.
