>>40559190>you dont understand the meaning of the word objectivelyNope. You're the one who doesn't understand what it means.
>Objectively is not what most people consider to be trueNot necessarily. If it's 100 degrees Celsius outside you can objectively say it's "hot" despite there not being an "absolute truth" of what temperature "hot" starts at. "Objective" means "without using personal feelings," not "absolute truth."
>because there is no obective way to measure "content".Yes there is. It's the standard of how much content is good for a $60 game. If a game is $60, and it consists of nothing walking a character down an empty hallway for 1 minute and then getting to the credits, OBJECTIVELY you can say the game has a low amount of content because EVERY OTHER $60 game set standards for how much content a game at that price point should have.
>>40559192>p-paid reviewsWhatever helps you cope at night.
>you can't change much in games based on sports except for graphics and updated teamsBut they're still repetitive and unoriginal so they should still be bashed by your logic.
>>40559237>but they're way behind when it comes to modern techniques[citation needed]
>Just fucking use LODsDQ11 is also bad with pop in. Are the DQ11 developers incompetent too?
>>40559240>spaghetti-code shovelware[citation needed]
