>>40956364>No, but I believe a franchise capable of grossing that much money should be able to produce a quality video game1. They are producing quality video games, objectively. It isn't bad just because your special snowflake box filler isn't in the game.
2. Why should they be able to produce quality video games just because Timmy bought some plushies and trading cards that have nothing to do with the developer?
>when franchises that earn much lessHow do you know they're earning much less? You still have yet to provide a source for how much profit GF is making and how much budget they have per game.
>>40956365nah :)
>>40956391>>make about 4 billion a year across 25 yearsAgain, this number is worthless if I don't know how much money had to be used to produce that 4 billion.
>>cant make a game that runs well, looks good, has more features than the previous gameBut it does run well, look good, and have more features than the previous game....so what's the problem here again?
