>>40980454>100 are new Are there really 100 new pokemon in galar? I counted like 50. And what if every single pokemon you ever liked isn't in the game? And isn't in the game next generation either? How many pokemon will skip several generations?
>new region with 20 new routes/areasDepends what you mean. Does this mean "area" and "route" are the same thing? There are 10 new routes. What counts as an "area"? Is a building an area? This seems like a weasel cocksucker way to make 10 new routes seem big by conflating new "areas" into the route count
>Overworld encountersAre shit. Random is better
>any pokemon can become competitively viableANY pokemon? No, species that are not viable will never be. Species that were once viable because of megas will no longer be viable. Species made viable by any one game gimmick will be enviable in future because game freak no longer carries gimmicks across games. Any species viable because if gigantimax won't be viable in gen 9, and maybe won't be viable in remakes either. If they're even in
>online is balanced enough that 40 pokemonOh wow, a whole 9% of pokemon are viable.
>720p resolutionWhat fucking year is this?
>requires 5 hours of breeding and grinding tp become competitively viableSo put these quality of life fixes in. A 5 minute fix that does not require you to remove half the pokemon
>online is balanced enough that 10 pokemon are commonly usedOh wow, completely broken multiplayer is even more broken. Who cares.
>only pvp multiplayerGood. PvE multiplayer is joke because PvE pokemon has always been a joke
>no trainer customizationEvery game has this now. And I wish it didn't. I fucking hate this special snowflake dress up shit and never use it. I'd take 50 more pokemon in the game over this
>240p resolutionImplies that cutting 400 pokemon allowed them to bump it up to the MASSIVE HIGH RES CUTTING EDGE 720p, when we already know for a fact that they're using the same old 3DS models so this excuse doesn't fly