>>41014400why would you hate someone for designing something you don't like? He's making interesting adaptations, not the best or most representative. He never claimed to be any sort of authority. And on an objective level, the ones people complain about aren't terrible, just extreme stretches.
What I think his detractors miss is that that's the appeal in-and-of-itself to his proponents, not something the ignore. Like, the appeal of the OP is "you could make an animal that looks like frosslass by making a weird-shaped bug", not "this is what frosslass would look like if it was real". Same with
>>41014230 
