>>41103036>List anything of the list that wasn't in prior games>Unskippable cutscenesEasy. Now stop seething because somebody insulted your shitty bloated pic.
>>41103107It's bloated. If you want a few examples without much digging, 5 and 8 should not be separate, and his gripes about competitive balance are so unfounded he needs to spend time trying to convince the reader that the meta for VGC (Gamefreak doesn't care about singles) will be broken. This point specifically cannot be made before the game's launch. And then there's all the points about how X "looks bad" or how OP was expecting X to be in the game, but there wasn't X (even though X was never promised).
I'm not going to go through every item on there since he's using a fallacy called Gish Gallop.
There's one line that really separates the original TPWG1 pic and this knockoff, "Even if that's intentional, its still retarded" in regards to Blizzard's accuracy. That's because everything there was for a mechanical standpoint of the game, not OP's seething opinion.
>Right now the images selected are kind of arbitrary.I made this point the last time retard OP made a thread for his shitty pic, but in the other "the problems with Gen 1" image, the pictures aren't random - they're sprites that look disproportionate to the species, or just plain bad. The OP here meanwhile is trying to say that the designs of the characters and the coloring and textures are shit right next to pictures of the starters and a few of the actual good designs. Zero thought was put into that decision.
