Quoted By:
Let's go tweet-by-tweet.
>1. The game is being emulated already, meaning that people have access to the data. Other than a livestream of the decompiling, the images are all that are needed for proof since no other means are available.
>2. If she could take the models and compare them, then why doesn't she? There's copies of the game already out.
>3. "It's impossible to judge development decisions without working on the game." If she truly believed this lie, then she'd take her own advice. In fact, as someone with experience in the field, she should be able to look at a product and at least infer some of the development behind it. Even before looking it up to verify my suspicion, I can look at her Cake Bash game and tell by the lighting that she's using Unity (not to knock it, since I use that too).
>4. It matters if we're told that the models, animations, and overall graphics are being improved. Handwaving.
>5. Of course Game Freak didn't lie to intentionally be malicious for the sake of it. Maybe they did it to protect their bottom line. Maybe it was a gaffe that went too far, or just an expectation they didn't meet. But, they lied.
>6. "Please be kind." Pleading that people don't notice the model mishaps isn't an argument. Someone please send her a copy of this comment (I don't have Twatter).
