>>41137172Having every Pokémon should be the bare minimum, not "a demanding request".
Before you say the Switch can't handle it, a 3.6GB 3DS game can have 807 Pokémon, there's no reason that a Switch game of much greater filesize can't have about 100 more.
Technology marches on, GF and their shill army don't.
And what good is an army that can't march?
It's not technological limitations, it's GF being LAZY.
If you think it's too much work for a company just to port over models that are already there, you are REALLY gullible.
It's not too much work to be practical, it's too much work for Game Freak's desire to effortlessly rush out shitty games every year for Christmas sales.
Why is 1000 the arbitrary limit shills have chosen?
>Oh no, we'd have to add an extra 0 digit before existing numbers! 
