>>41155941it has half the central content of the last game and a tenth the sideshows for 1.5x the price and the devs justified all of that by saying the things that look like shit are actually where all the effort went
if you think it's not bad, get an older one because every one but R/B are better. if you played the older ones, why spend more on Game But Worse?
your wallet is worth more than you think it is, and you've been subconsciously putting off big purchases because "little" ones like these pile up to nickel and dime you yearly. think hard for even a moment about all the things that have more than one zero in their price tag that you haven't been properly saving for. pokemon sword and every empty sequel like it are blocking you from them, and you're letting them do it.
