>>41163177I've unintentionally adjusted the way I feel something should score because of the dumbass way reviewers score shit.
>1, 2, 3/10Absolutely horrible and significant tech issues. E.g. Fallout 76
>4/10Absolutely horrible or bad with significant tech issues. E.g. Any asset flip generally
>5/10Bad, not much good about it, not much fun, but nothing particularly offensive. E.g. Revelation Online or some other dull korean MMO
>6/10Meh or okay, can be fun and even have strong points but is generally not worth your time. E.g. Pokemon Sun/Moon
>7/10Above average or good, has some flaws and/or doesn't especially shine anywhere but is notable all the same. E.g. PMD Explorers of Sky
>8/10Great, needs polish here or there but generally excels in what it tries to do. E.g. Splatoon 2
>9/10Great, excels in most areas and lacks notable flaws. E.g.
I don't think I've ever thought something was a 9>10/10Entirely subjective territory that no game should ever be scored on a more professional level.
It's Rune factory 4, the perfect game 
