>>41257817Numbers oversimplify things anyways. It should just either be Like, Dislike, or Mixed. A 7/10 may be considered "good" by one person and "C-grade" by another. Plus, most people either give a max-rating or min-rating with X out of Y systems.
It won't stop review-bombing, but at least it'll stop the bullshit of pointless scores.
>>41257936>implying those zealots don't shield poor PokeSwSh form the baddy bad incels for free>>41257894Is there a chart showing numbers rated? Maybe we can find a new calculation by ignoring all 0s and 10s.