>>41344258>>41344590https://lmgtfy.com/?q=%22nintendo+switch%22+orange+screen+-pokemon&s=y>About 15,100,000 results >Results date back to Switch Launch yearSounds more like you just weren't paying attention to the issue until you decided Pokemon was the cause of it. You can be suspect of the idea that Pokemon is causing issues, that's fair. But it's rather shortsighted to affirm confidence in Pokemon being the cause despite credible experts on the matter dismissing it, low sample size (yes, even including the pastebin), and prevalence of the issue before the game's debut.
There's nothing wrong with following the story with hopes that it reveals itself as true. But it's important to refrain from deluding yourself into championing sensational reports that rely more on emotional attachment to the idea of them being real rather than actual analysis of the evidence outside of the small bubble they're presented in.
This is a lesson not just for Pokemon, but for navigating the current landscape of social discordance plaguing channels of discussion on the internet right now. People try to create mobs, people try to create outrage, people are naturally inclined to exhibit tribal behaviors. But you're better than that, anon. If there's one thing this shitty site has taught me, it's to always question group-think and how to recognize when people are being weaponized for conspiracy. It's the same cancer plaguing Facebook - everyone just wants to believe the most outrageous scenario even when provided evidence of the contrary. And then they'll shut themselves into an echo chamber of others who have fallen into the same trap - all because some corporate fatcat is profiting from the outrage, or some political group is forming a radical opponent to scapegoat.
Really anon, I want the best for you. I'm not perfect, but I've gone down this path too many times to fall for this shit again.
