>>41532188Even if they do, which is doubtful, since there's no logic in asking subpoena for a site that wasn't involved, it wouldn't come to fruition. The posts don't exist on 4chan(nel) anymore, doubt the logs do for longer than a week. If they miraculously did last long enough (say, a month), they still need to ask 4chan to retain the information until they can properly ask for it, which is another can of worms.
>>41532037They're just being respectful in their wording, as any formal document may do so, which is amped up to eleven in a court document.