>>41565882Yes because I still have the scores from before your ebin bots manipulated it to fit your narrative.
>>41565849>th-they have opinions that don't fit my circlejerk so they're biased!Your lack of self awareness is incredible.
>is far from the definition of a general consensusWrong. The fact that hundreds of people voted and most of them think the game is good means that there's a general consensus that the game is good. General consensus has nothing to do with literally everyone who bought the game rating it.
>>41565918>that doesn't have any bearing on how valid and representative their opinions areYes it does. The site is for scoring games. Therefore people from all sorts of different communities will come onto it for rating the game.
>the retards that gave swish a 10 because "hurr best game evur stop complainkng about dexit" Hmmmm good thing none of those other games had any controversies surrounding them that had a bunch of people review bombing them and people countering with 10s then, huh?
