>>41643540Calling out shitty arguments != defending the game's shortcomings.
I won't defend the subpar graphics. Or the game being too easy. But when you use shitty arguments like "removed moves = bad" or "I can't catch an overleveled tyranitar right away = bad" or "the models are the same even though they objectively aren't" don't get upset when someone calls your shitpost out, dexfag.
>>41643570>Congradulations on finding the one model that needed more workThere are more in the thread that had work done to them, anon.
>Via baking a higher res ambient occlusion render on top of itThe changes are completely arbitrary. There is no automated solution for the textures.
>>41643595>removing return means the game has less interactions with friendshipDoes the game NEED more interactions with friendship though? It already affects evolution methods and you get a reward for it in the form of a ribbon. It doesn't need more.
>removing return is a hard nerf to all physical normal typesAnd? Is nerfing physical normal types bad considering how much neutral coverage STAB normal moves get?
>its very satisfy having return power up as you travel with the monster moreIt's very unsatisfying to use return on every single Pokemon because it makes every other normal physical move redundant.
>the game is unironically worse off with return gonenah
>>41643607If the review lists points that are flat out false, or dubious points without even explaining them, then the review is dishonest. It isn't a hard concept to grasp.
