Here's my team I made for that champion thread. I tend to use Pokemon I've never used before every time I play a game, even if I don't like them, so there's not a whole lot one could gather from an ingame team.
For my ratings, I'm going to assume you're all just LARPing about buying SS for your own sakes.
>>41647141You really don't understand why some people adamantly hate humanoid designs - as long as they're not uncannily human (or have some interesting aspect that redeems this), it's fine in your eyes.
>>41647156You have no interest in appealing to "niche" tastes or trying to avoid being "normie". If you like a Pokemon, that's that, and there's no reason to change your opinions because some other anon likes/dislikes that Pokemon.
>>41647229You liked Sobble and Impidimp when they were first revealed, and you feel slightly smug that you recognised Impidimp's potential before Grimmsnarl was leaked.
>>41647842You don't enjoy using teams that don't have a strategy beyond "hit the thing with the right move", even if it's for ingame. Better to slightly go out of your way to do something interesting than to do the boring but effective method.
>>41647869Despite using exclusively Gen 8 mons, this team gives me the impression that you don't actually like most Gen 8 mons. Besides Dracovish, every mon here is one of the few widely accepted Gen 8 mons, and Dracovish is a funny meme to you.
>>41648692Somewhat similarly to the anon before last, you don't enjoy usinga team if there's no sense of theme or personality in it. Monotype teams are boring to you, but so are arbitrary mixes of Pokemon that aim for effectiveness rather than aiming for a certain aesthetic.
>>41648796If I'm right about the previous anon, you think they're a fucking dipshit.
>>41648798Like 156, you have no interest in changing your tastes to suit other people. You may (read: are) also be a furry.
Continuing in the next post.
