/vp/ - Pokémon » Thread #41696543

[22 / 6 / ?]

239KiB, 748x1044, 35.jpg

Anonymous Mon 02 Dec 2019 12:15:31 No.41696543 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>41696751 >>41696783 >>41696856 >>41696905 >>41697569

> Galarian Obstagoon
> Galarian Perrserker
TCG cards add "Galarian" before the new evolution names. Hint TPC intends to introduce their regular non galar forms eventually?

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 02 Dec 2019 12:36:40 No.41696751 Report

Quoted By:

>>41696543
Who knows

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 02 Dec 2019 12:39:21 No.41696783 Report

Quoted By: >>41696835

>>41696543
They did the same for Alolan forms, so it's hard to judge from precedent.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 02 Dec 2019 12:43:12 No.41696835 Report

Quoted By:

>>41696783
Every Alola form already had a prior regular form, anon. Regional evolutions were introduced in Galar.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 02 Dec 2019 12:45:26 No.41696856 Report

Quoted By:

>>41696543
I doubt there are any plans. It's probably just for consistency or playing it safe if they ever do make a Hoennian Obstagoon.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 02 Dec 2019 12:49:13 No.41696905 Report

Quoted By: >>41697140

>>41696543
Just like regular Zigzagoon can't evolve into Obstagoon, the TCG regular Zigzagoon can't evolve into Obstagoon either. They're just being consistent here, it has nothing to do with future plans.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 02 Dec 2019 13:09:31 No.41697140 Report

Quoted By:

>>41696905
But they didn't need to list Galarian Obstagoon because it literally says for evolution "Evolves from Galarian Linoone"

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 02 Dec 2019 13:17:04 No.41697228 Report

Quoted By: >>41697556 >>41698165

It's so they can have other cards that only affect ones with "Galarian" in the name

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 02 Dec 2019 13:49:18 No.41697556 Report

Quoted By:

>>41697228
>Gexit
>Discard all Galarian Pokemon in play.

>Hard Gexit
>Discard all Galarian Pokemon in play. Galarian Pokemon played after this card is used require 2x as much energy.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 02 Dec 2019 13:50:26 No.41697569 Report

Quoted By:

>>41696543
very pretty card

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 02 Dec 2019 13:53:26 No.41697607 Report

Quoted By: >>41697630

Call me when trainers aren't just the character official art slapped on a generic background.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO Marnie-SR-68.jpg, 94KiB, 524x671

Anonymous Mon 02 Dec 2019 13:55:04 No.41697630 Report

Quoted By: >>41697688

>>41697607

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1575219108039.jpg, 58KiB, 467x613

Anonymous Mon 02 Dec 2019 13:59:22 No.41697688 Report

Quoted By: >>41697718 >>41698283

>>41697630
Assuming that's a secret rare, I'm talking shit like this

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 02 Dec 2019 14:01:38 No.41697718 Report

Quoted By:

>>41697688
Well yeah how else are they supposed to make retards buy boxes of packs if they put the good looking cards at low rarity

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 02 Dec 2019 14:22:01 No.41697923 Report

Quoted By:

??? If you believe tcg is going to print only cards of pokemon in the galar dex you are wrong. Tcg does not give a shit about your stupid game.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO en_US-SM8-SV81-aether_foundation (...).jpg, 185KiB, 734x1024

Anonymous Mon 02 Dec 2019 14:42:56 No.41698165 Report

Quoted By:

>>41697228
This. Support for Alolan Pokemon was lacking (I think it was just pic related), but I assume that was because the TCG decided to treat Ultra Beasts as the generation's equivalent to a villainous team with unique support (much like Plasma Pokemon in Gen 5). Since Gen 8 doesn't have anything equivalent to UBs and Team Yell doesn't even count as a villainous team, Galarian Pokemon should see more support than Alolans ever did.

I mean I guess they could've just had the support cards say something like "any Pokemon with Galarian in its name or that evolves from a Pokemon with Galarian in its name" but this is more straightforward.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO stop.jpg, 23KiB, 300x413

Anonymous Mon 02 Dec 2019 14:49:37 No.41698257 Report

Quoted By: >>41698305 >>41698321 >>41698346

Why did they make Poison types Pokémom into Dark type cards this time around? This is like the third time it got changed.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1605994.jpg, 53KiB, 322x450

Anonymous Mon 02 Dec 2019 14:52:02 No.41698283 Report

Quoted By:

>>41697688
Retard thats the regular art
They do stock art cards since sen 1

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 02 Dec 2019 14:54:02 No.41698305 Report

Quoted By:

>>41698257
Makes the most sense to me.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 02 Dec 2019 14:54:53 No.41698321 Report

Quoted By: >>41698506

>>41698257
probably so dark pokemon would have something of a playable base unlike past formats
desu I would also move rock to steel, having fighting as a combo of 3 types and hitting 3 types super-effectively is fucking stupid

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 02 Dec 2019 14:56:45 No.41698346 Report

Quoted By:

>>41698257
Second actually
All I know is dark crobat will be dope

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 02 Dec 2019 15:08:02 No.41698506 Report

Quoted By:

>>41698321
>desu I would also move rock to steel, having fighting as a combo of 3 types and hitting 3 types super-effectively is fucking stupid
Yeah Fighting now feels super weird and cluttered since it's the only remaining "3 in 1" TCG type. I suppose the problem with grouping Rock with Steel is that Ground and Rock are too similar to separate.

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

On these archives

Your latest searches