>>41732838Not at all.
Just throwing random coverage on your Pokemon without thinking about synergy is dumb, and tons of Pokemon will just use 1 attacking move with 3 status moves.
Also, unlike Dynamaxing, having 4 move slots creates much more strategies and increases Teambuilding skills. Where as Dynamaxing forces every team to run HO+Ditto with how dominant it currently is, greatly reducing teambuilding skills since you are punished for being creative (at a high level, not lel using dive against my friends)
>>41732845Switching, having 4 moves, and status moves are fucking essential you retard.
All 3 have existed from the start of the series and removing them would dumb down the gameplay.
Removing switches means all matches depend on what you lead with your team, and will also remove any prediction/long term planning skills.
The latter also being removed if you let Dynamaxing stay since most of the time, its a free “kill half your team” button.
Banning 4 moves per Pokemon would do what I mentioned to the previous anon.
Same also applies to Status moves.
Yes, the game can technically be played without them, but the gameplay is turned shallow and with less skills that make Pokemon competitive.
>>41732848See above.
If you removed Dynamaxing, a new feature never before seen, it would actually improve the meta and make it more skillful.
