>>41747466>we're not talking about the previous onesIf we have to consider what kanto-pandering could mean drastically, yes, we have to consider the past to predict the future.
>"it isn't a flaw"Not taking in considerations which mons can actually be good with that gymmick, which can actually fit thematically, or simply don't leave the other creations to be forgotten and never be updated somehow, instead of taking priority of the original kanto mons, yes it's a flaw, you're doing preferences over a franchise which have a lot of mon, at this point you could do a balanced percentage of mons per gen, taking of course a huge priority for the currenty generation.
>How does this make the quality of the game worse? How does Machamp having a new form instead of Conkeldurr make the game worse?I already explained actually, saying that not considering some good ideas, interpetrations or inspirations, not considering other mons from the other generations, is bad because you're not only let the other being forgot or not having special things, but you're even limitating your creativity area only because you want to pander kanto.
>they're literally in the wild areaYes like the Yungoose. Indeed Yungoose aren't actually native of alola. I also said how discussing about this is pretty useless because the argument is different. Since of course they're in the wild area and routes if the DEVS actually introduced them in. And that's not totally a problem by itself, the problem is how those are shilled in the game, seeing that 3 gym leaders use them as ace, the galar champion use one of them as ace, because those have gigantamax like others of the same gen.
