>>41828956>Corporate loyalty? Brand tribalism? What the fuck is wrong with you autists?No one in this thread has said any of these things.
>"Duh dat fiktional monster doesn't look like what I'm used to seeing so its bad"Thinking something is hideous and aesthetically displeasing, is not the same as what you are describing.
>This is the reason gamefreak delivers sub-quality trash.Because they're on an annual release schedule cut corners, knowing it will sell regardless? What does that have to do with this thread?
>The game looks very similar to a monster catching game you are all specifically invested in, by being on this board,If I want to play Pokemon, I can play Pokemon; I'm not going to want to play an ugly, transparent imitation of it, which is exactly what TemTem is.
>and does a few interesting things on its own that might be worth checking out.It doesn't. Almost everything it does is directly copying Pokemon, and everything else is done poorly.
>The genre predates pokemon and will probably outlast it.Yes, and that matters because...?
>Think as an individual consumer of a product.I have. Your product is creatively bankrupt, the monster designs are unappealing, and you're wanting people to buy a MMO that will also have a subscription fee, a model that is absolutely not sustainable.
Are you being paid to shill this, or do you do it for free?
