>>42026881I agree with your overall point but
>voltorb/electrodemimics, they didn't look like pokeballs, they looked specifically like overworld pokeballs. While yes, by definition they are object monsters, the term objectmon applies less. It was stupid but the designs were never meant to make it to a sequel.
>mukclose, but being an amorphous pile of animated waste is a bit less, "objecty" than the typical target of scorn, its about as much as an objectmon as koffing/weezing
>magnemiteit is an objectmon granted, but it isn't an object with a face like *pulls name out of hat* klefki
>ditto and porygonnot objectmon by any stretch of the imagination
