>>42029807>Zygarde 10%Zygarde 50% was dragon type, and the Zygarde cores look vaguely draconic
>VibravaIt's final evo is a dragon, and they probably didn't want to repeat a type that was done the gen previous (Ground/Flying), so they made it part Dragon type.
>GuzzlordWhy do retards think "Dragon" just means "DURR IT BIG LIZARD"? Early depictions of dragons ranged from what seemed to be Dinosaurs, to fucking snails.
>SligooSee what I said about early dragon depictions above.
>GiratinaHow isn't it a dragon?
>Serpentine (Origin) and vaguely dinosaur-esque (Altered)>A dragon along with Dialga and Palkia>KingdraI mean, it's based off something literally called a SEA DRAGON.
As for the other side:
>LugiaWhy not complain about it not being water type? It's basically a more anthropomorphic whale, it really isn't that "dragon-like" in any sense of the definition.
>GyaradosIt's a fucking windsock. That's why it's Water/Flying. Why do normalfags still not understand this?
>MiloticWhat? What is even draconic about it? By this retard's logic any vaguely serpentine mon should just be part dragon.
>CharizardDragon type was only really made for the Dratini line in gen 1, and they didn't want any of the starters to have a clear advantage battling-wise.
>AerodactylSee above
