>>42141060I was aware of both versions because the diaper version is literally next to the underwear version which is the one I posted.
Like is this a joke? You know the thread is derailed, right? If that's your goal then there.
If not then
>lol he tagged panties on that one because tagging diaper would be cub>he actually tagged the diaper version with diaper thus rendering that argument uselessand you just ignore that you were wrong there? Why did the artist tag that one with panties, anon? I'm waiting.
You were wrong, just admit it. You look like a retard and we both look incredibly autistic so....
