>>42238561It is a good channel, but I wish they did more than just singles smogon shit and VGC for the occasional mon that made decent placements, only ever elaborating on why some mons weren't viable rarely even then. Maybe they should have touched on the viability of mons in smogon doubles, in the 3v3 singles ladder, or maybe triples or rotation for Gen 5 and 6. It would also be nice if their autistic fanbase didn't dictate what Pokemon they review, because it's always either a fan favorite, a competitive superstar, a mon that's notorious for being bad as a joke, or any combination of the three. It was great when they covered more obscure Pokémon like Sandslash or Leavanny, or even when they reviewed the Ice type as a whole, and I wish they did more of that stuff. Overall though, they're pretty good. Without them I would never have known Aggron wasn't a shitmon in Gen 4, so you won't hear me saying they're bad.
