Quoted By:
to whom: "better the dlc of the third version": you are inept, because you cannot be satisfied with an incomplete game cut specifically to sell you the postgame later ... at least in the old episodes, the "basic" versions were not incomplete and guaranteed hours of post-game content other than "online fights". The "ultra" versions were enriched with different variations of the same story, minigames, a couple of new pokemon etc., but nothing that distorted the original idea, which however was explained entirely.
Do you want proof that the content has been specially cut and not thought of all afterwards? Rose came in second in the league when he was a matchmaker (his card says so) ... and they don't say who it was who finished first! well it's in the dlc, and you can find it as a teacher.
Rose is said to be a miner / explorer throwing the information there without any apparent sense ... and here comes the brother in the second dlc that happens to be the explorer! And surely the past of roses will be deepened ...
these things make me mad, as much as ff15 gladio that returns everything scarred without knowing where it was and why, and you will have to pay the 10 euros to know it ...
Was it so difficult to make a full game directly? even at the cost of bringing it out in 2020?
Is it so difficult for the fanbase to understand that selling a mediocre and cut + dlc product practically mandatory for the main plot is MUCH WORST to sell the third title revisited?
Extremely unjustifiable then the continuous claims on the opposition to add pokemon in the dlc when in reality they had already thought about it ... even the jigs of the starters can hardly believe that they were ideas born the day before yesterday ... so you first hear yourself say that the game that is it and if it suits you you buy it, then instead you pimp more pokemon and then you have to spend more money on it if you want to continue playing it ..
