>>42456251Technicaly true, but only if base game is worth its money and DLC brings something actualy good, and not something that should be in base game in the first place.
Previous Pokemon titles: 40$, with plenty of content and second version that builds on top of it.
SwSh: 60$ for very barebone, extremy lazy game with 30$ of DLC that feels like nothing in comparision to additional content in previous titles.
It's not "hurr durr one game+dlc better than two games" because SwSh has nothing to compare even with one previous game. It's a freaking first stationary console game for this series released in 2019 that is 20$ more expensive than all before it, there's no excuse for it being what it is.
