>>42470588I don't understand how can someone be this retarded and how it's even worth discussing. So GF paints a dragon in orange so it's enough to warrant it as an original design? You're scraping the absolute bottom of the barrel for arguments at this point. Why wouldn't you for someone that has clearly shit for the ability to debate.
>Pot calling the kettle black. How come you don't care about Charizard being inspired by fire salamanders and only focus on the obvious dragon aesthetic? Fukcing hypocrite.It's called Charmander so it must be based on fire salamender!! Go learn some biology you fucking hack.
>That's a concept that already existed, GF brought nothing new to the table when they made Incineroar, you fucking idiot.Your sources? Painting a dragon orange and giving a belly is peak originality though according to this imbecile.
>The ENTIRE argument is that 'Zard and 'Tar look better at face value than Cinderace and Incineroar, the complete opposite. Keep your horsehit fully subjective opinions to yourself. You're not making any point here.
Laughable debate, just amounts to "I hate the new designs" while desperately trying to pass them as facts. Calls me hypocrite and strawman while he keeps contradicting himself in his own points while making no valuable point in the meantime. It's 100% elementary school-level namecalling and 0% substance.
There's no point in debating further with a cancerous retard like you. If I have the misfortune to meet you in real life, I'd sock you in the face 'till you wouldn't able to breathe. Cheers
