>>42469716This post
>>42468151 was to explain why Charizard or Pikachu wouldn't be considered for the undercover normie image, yet you and your amazing reading skills thought I was making a statement about whether this poster
>>42468126 was normie or not.
Based on that wrong assumption, you went on the attack about "hurdur look at other people's bad reading skills" (a mistake that was a result of your own lack of reading comprehension, ironic), all the while stating that said poster "literally said he was a normie" when "not feeling shame about that" could easily mean not feeling shame about having Rayquaza and Arcanine as faves, not necessarily about being a normie or not. But again, the original reply wasn't even about that so it was neither here nor there regardless.
Just admit that you completely deviated from the original point that was being made to make a "lol other people's reading comprehension sucks" post, but maybe your head is too far up your own ass to man up to it.
