>>42579878>Dude, if you are struggling to act like a human. Go to some classes that teach you the best way to do so, since you think money is no object. That aside, that isn't the real objection here and you know it.
A new price point gets added to this train wreck and you fools go to the, "Well if you don't have enough money, blah blah blah".
Pokemon wasn't about having enough money, it was about having enough skill. Everything was open to everyone, and there was no separation between players except what skills they brought.
Now you are already showing that somehow, if you can afford crap, that in and of itself makes you better.
Does it make you somehow feel better that they are stroking your ego little boy?
That aside, let's look at your fantasy.
60 dollars for base game. What can I say? It is the standard price for a Nintendo switch game. If we got a complete game in the manner of the past games, this would be acceptable. We didn't.
30 dollar DLC. Basically they charged 30 dollars to complete the game. I know some of you will comment "Well you know, all they did was add all the data we would have gotten and had to pay more for with a third version." No, they charged us 30 dollars extra for things that should have been in the base game from word go. If they had included the pokemon home as part of the dlc, might have swung it for them, but no.
15 dollars for pokemon Home.
105 dollars for full use of this.
Mind you, previous gen this cost was maybe 45 dollars. The common argument is, "This is a game for kids." Sure seems like they are fleecing those kids. Taking them for all the money they could have.
It is worse though because some of the stuff that they sell through the premium version of home the provided for far less. This doesn't break down into weither you are rich, or poor. I am pretty sure everyone can spend that much on a game, but the point is should we have to do so to obtain a complete game?
