Quoted By:
Gen 5 is my favorite but this is autism incarnate.
For fucking starters putting old games in low tiers because "They old and not as gud as n guys!!" is retarded. Games should be judged in respect to what their console is capable of. Likewise they should be judged based on how they improved upon what came before them and/or what changes and new shit they brought to the table. Going off of that, I'd say an pretty god objective tier list is as follows. (keep in mind I'm judging third versions as directors cuts so they may be much higher or lower than the originals depending on how well they work as such)
S tier-
GS, Platinum, HGSS
A tier-
BW, BW2, Emerald, FRLG
B tier-
RS, DP, SM, USUM, RB
C tier-
XY, Crystal
D tier-
ORAS, Y
F tier-
SwSh
These are ordered within tiers too. Again, I am judging based on how well Each game fullfilled it's purpose, so the criteria changes (GS are judged by how they improved the groundwork from RB, HGSS are judged by how they improved and added to the original GS, etc)
I am open to criticism and opposing points, so please send me some (you)s
