>>42737155>Dark type isn't strictly related to nocturnal creaturesDark type is ideal for nocturnal creatures. Even going back in Gen II, the time where you could catch most (and I think all) Dark-related pokemon was during at night. It's self-explanatory and fits the best. I don't undertsand why you argue so much about it unless you dislike the type.
>Dark type pokemon are the ones that use trickery and underhanded tacticsEh...hello? Vampires? Sneaking up at night and using illusions? You're actually further proving my point.
>>42737170>Crobat is literally a vampire bat that learns leech life and other bite based moves, what more could you want?Moves that are useless to it since there is no point in using them and nobody does anyway seriously.
Vampires bite and drain life. It should be a no-brainer for a supposed vampire-related pokemon to have a dedicated STAB LP-draining move.
>Okay, here is GliscorSame with Gliscor.
The problem isn't so much the looks, as it is the typing, abilities and the actual moveset in-use.
>It's clearly based on a fucking vampire, just look at itOk and Charizard looks like a fucking dragon. Just look at it...
Idiot.
>furies, furies, furiesI almost never visit /vp/. I have stopped playing Pokemon other than in Smogon occasionally. But I played a lot when I was younger. I hate furries. But it seems that you seem to hate them at an unnatural level. Almost like...projecting? Referencing them all the time out of nowhere.
What's a furry anyway? An anthropomorphic animal/pokemon? Does this mean that if find Machoke cool then I'm a furry...?