>>42741649> swooshie> perfectionpick one.
>>42741662we care because your purchases doom the franchise. rope goes AROUND the neck.
>>42741666literally what was improved? i can't think of a single thing. please tell me about this improvement.
>>42741670> good games are acceptable> he thinks swooshie is gooddo i need to bring the list up again?
also, cutting content only to resell it for more money isn't acceptable. having less content and charging more money isnt acceptable. lying to the customers isn't acceptable.
> improvement argumentthis isnt about improving the games to achieve perfection, this is about improving them until they're actually passable as triple-A titles. they are not good, and they're objectively inferior to its predecessors.
>>42741844literally what are you talking about? the games were fine until b/w when content cuts started happening. they cut more and more content as the titles went by after that, and pokemon died. i have cared about the series and have been disappointed since b2w2. go back to twitter kanto coomer.
>>42741920> "can't afford home."or maybe i don't want to waste money on a pokemon prison for an inferior pokemon game?
