>>42801849>illusion of meaningful gameplay>implyingBruv what are you talking about? It had the best gameplay of all mobile games. And the RNG wasnt that bad. The point of the game was to use your figures in the possible putcome to maximize its potential. Yes thre are times when a 1 on 1 wont come out in your favor, but thats the point. Do you risk having a 1 on 1 where the chances of you winning against them is high or low? Even if its low there is still a chance, and ways to imprive your chance, leaving it up to the other to decide who to handle it
>powercreepNo such thing. All figures are viable if you actually use them how theyre supposed to be used, case in point
>>42799446 
