>>42936325Not at all? I've given good, sometimes even perfect scores to "waifus, dragons and furries" in almost every gen, and I don't like Pokemon to look scary or nasty at all.
My personal favorties are things like Weezing, Barbaracle and Eelektross which people might call gross and monstrous but I love them for also having cuteness, not "in spite" of cuteness. They're "grotesque" in the way you could say a bulldog, warthog or buzzard are grotesque, but those are lovable and charming animals again because of, rather than in spite of, the things people might call ugly about them.
In fact, while I do like Grimmsnarl, it's not one of my personal favorites because it doesn't have that cute slant to me; it's just entirely badass. I think it's a perfect concept and design that I wouldn't change, but it's not one I would train and use myself.
