>>43004955It’s because Review Bombing is as legit as Russians hacking the election.
No one genuinely (key word “genuinely”) believes SWSH are good games, but they would rather not admit that they were wrong about it.
Just like how politicians, celebrities, and democrats couldn’t admit that there was a large amount of people that did vote for Trump.
If you were to look at each user review for Metacritic and Amazon, could put into an excel spread sheet the reviews that were;
>informative>had accurate values of pros and cons (“Haha Eiscue is so cute xD instant 10/10 game” being poorly valued and “Changing natures is a really nice addition” being properly valued)>Had objective statements about the content>Would make specific points about the game>ect.Would be found more often in the negative reviews, while most positive reviews would do the opposite or talk about the haters.
