>>43229982Worded that poorly because of autism. What I meant was having those groups, as a classification, would be broader in the sense that there would be, for example, Field 1, Field 2, or Aquatic 1-3, but instead they'd come under broader creature type (beast, fish etc.), and by self-contained, I meant they'd only have access to one, with the remaining elemental types.
I'd probably treat them the same as regular types, mostly because I think them being their own distinct and separate weakness/resistance to other creature types would just make things even more overly complicated than just adding 3 types.
Obviously if it were to be implemented in some way it would have to ironed out more, not that I can code or anything