>>43315114And my point is they should have designed the concept with that limitation in mind so it still made sense you dumbass, either by doing what
>>43315127 says or even better using the whole mutation idea.
>>43315010I don't expect Pokemon to be realistic, but I also don't expect it to make blatently obvious self-contradictory mistakes, especially when they only exist due to it going out of it's way.
Again., they EASILY could have just said "A mysterys phenonma has caused Pokemon to start to mutate and change types!" with no further explanation and that would make it way less dumb, but instead by leaning into the natural selection/adaption reason they shhoot themselves in the foot
