>>43371963>Come on, Rotom! Do I look like the kind of clown they'd allow in Galar? I review-bombed those games because they are awful. Everything GameFreak does these days is awful. It's enough to make anyone crazy.>So that's it, you got culled. That's your defense for degrading all the hardwork that came in these new titles? Because they did not put you and your favorites in?>No! I reviewed bombed the games because they couldn't make a SINGLE thing right to save their lives.(Audible groans from the Twitter shills in the audience)
>Ugh, why is everyone so defensive about these guys? If it was any other dev doing half the crap they did you'd not let them go free! EA does that crap everyday and you don't let them get away. You defend GameFreak because - because what? Because Joe Merrick made it a full time job to defend GameFreak on Twitter?>You have a problem with Joe Merrick too?>Yes, I do! Everything comes so easy for him.>What's wrong with that?>Have you seen what it's like out there, Rotom? Do you ever actually leave the dex? Nobody demands GameFreak makes a good game. Nobody can have standards anymore. You think men like Joe Merrick ever think what what's like to be an actual fan like me? To be someone but themselves? They don't! They think we'll just sit here and buy an awful game like good little boys. That we won't hack the game and datamine it!>That's so much self-pity, Stantler. It's almost like you are making excuses to have attacked those young devs. Not everybody - and I'll tell you this - not everybody is awful.(intimidating stare)
>You're awful, Rotom. 
