>>43411270Depends on the line. But out of the most sexualized Pokemon:
>GardevoirRegular form. No. Mega Gardevoir is pretty hard to defend its basically a bride. GF fully embraced it's waifu appeal.
>LucarioNo. I don't even think it was necessarily created to cater to furries. It just happened to.
>TsareenaYes. It's literally a dominatrix.
>BraixenUnironicaly, yes. It's hard to explain, but let's just say GF stealthily tried to capitalize off the furry appeal of Lucario.
>ZoroarkNo. It just happened to appeal to furries.
>IncineroarNo. Same explaination. Also it's design is intentionally a bit goofy.
>LopunnyDefinitely. It's a literal playboy bunny and bunny girl from Japanese media. All of which are sexualized. Mega Lopunny just drives the point eben further being based on an 80s fitness instructor who were fetishized.
>SalazzleAgain, yes. It's entirely anatomy implies breasts, hips, womb tattoos, etc. It's even based on an hawaiian seductress lizard.
>HattereneLeaning towards yes. It's hair is shaped like a busty witch the way it's built implies the hair is also it's body.
