>>43420047>Selective>>43418231 disagrees that it is selective>>43418535>Every time someone point at a flaw you pretend its pretend its cherrypicking (Claiming that the above-mentioned is a flaw that has been pointed out. Not that it is representative of all backgrounds, but that it is a single piece of evidence in favor of the games being bad)
>>43418639Posts another piece of evidence, demonstrating that that there are more bad backgrounds. Just because he's disagreeing with your "selective point" and providing more examples, doesn't mean he thinks all backgrounds are like his example; what he's obviously arguing against it the idea that there are only one or two instances of these bad backgrounds; hence, he adds to the point that there are several flaws, not to the point that these particular instances are the only instances or the representative majority--you inserted that idea.
>>43418789Argues that fishing leading you to a land battle etc. is bullshit. Whether he means the defense is bullshit or the fact that that's what GF decided to do is bullshit, or that it only happens on a one off moment is bullshit is not clearly defined. Nevertheless, disagreeing that it happens in only a one off moment is not the same as saying he thinks it happens in every instance.
>>43418804Asks how you can defend the lazy background above, implying that the one above is already enough to be a problem. Not implying that the pier instance is representative of all battles.
Good enough? If you still want to believe that everyone was saying that those two battle backgrounds were representative, go ahead.
>>43420122>How dare you prove me wrong! Whatever, man.
