>>43456986>>43456986Actually I'm wasting time replying again to something that already showed multiple signs of being a retard instead of a human being, such as:
>it's unable to read and understand simple sentences in a language it's proficient with>it vomits assumptions>it misses the point of the very art it's trying to "defend" from an "attack" itself assumed from criticism of small detailsBut let's roll with it, thing, for one last time.
(Odds are you won't understand this, but others might enjoy.)
Yes, it's art. And its appeal is to explain fantasy creatures through scientific concepts and tone, in some sort of "fantasy sci-fi" where the fantasy becomes more believable and the sci-fi becomes more imaginative. The author is aware of that because he goes through the effort to add scientifically sound explanations, like:
Isoprene as Charmander's fuel - it's easy to extract isoprene from real life plants.
Pikachu's "warning" yellow - it's a common real life evolutionary strategy.
Geodude stone as chalk - while soft, it's a common real life biogenic mineral.
"Real life" this, "real life" that... does it ring a bell for you? Art doesn't exist in a vacuum, it is related to real life, you disgusting retard. And regarding the calcium carbonate, it would be more believable (i.e. closer to the author's intentions) the way I mentioned, for the reasons I've mentioned.
The names he used for the Latin binomials are also related to that. Go look in a dictionary what "Vermis foetidum" means (I'm talking about Caterpie BTW, not you). I bet that, if the author knew Latin, he would build them from NOM+GEN as I mentioned.
Those are NOT "arbitrary definitions". The whole fucking deal of the piece of art you're fucking mistakenly trying to defend is to present fantasy creatures from a scientific point of view.
Now please go be something retarded/disgusting elsewhere, like in a grave. PLEASE.
That was the last time I've answered your idiocy/filth.
