>>43527592>You would've realised that if you'd, big shock, picked up on the context.Yea, no. Hold off on your shitflinging and actually use your brain for a sec. The majority of your post hinged on regurgitating to me something I already knew. I just pointed out that your post was completely pointless to me, who is already well-informed on what abstractions are. I told you in explicit terms that I don't need unnecessary explanations, so please don't be a stupid tard and make me repeat myself to you again.
>Kill yourself unironicallyAnd there is. Completely predictable. Sasuga, retard. Bravo.
I await your next low IQ post full of insults and KYS threats. That is the extent of your argument capabilities after all, it seems.
>>43527582>so you’re coping by calling it a buzzword. Tell me I’m wrongTechnically, you are wrong. Just look up definitions of 'buzzword'.
>1. An stylish or trendy word or phrase, especially when occurring in a specialized field.>2. A word drawn from or imitative of technical jargon, and often rendered meaningless and fashionable through abuse by non-technical persons in a seeming show of familiarity with the subject.>3. stock phrases that have become nonsense through endless repetitionAbstraction really has become just nonsense jargon I see get repeated a lot on /v/ these past few years
