>>43528929i honestly dont understand that argument at all. i mean, sure, originality is important and all obviously, and in a point of defense against gamefreak, also sure. but why make someone who loves pokemon and wants to make a pokemon fangame whos clearly put so much thought, time, and energy behind it change the pokemon themselves other than legal shit? they want to make a fucking pokemon game not some fake tryhard bullshit
imo fan artwork, stories, and games should be fully allowed as long as their not monetary. companies behind such IPs should seek out fan creators, since this motherfucker is clearly doing better than all of gamefreak now at making a pretty game
what i think is wrong is when fan content pretends to be the real content (see: bootlegs trying to be pokemon, and the king james bible)
