>>43579620>and Araquanid wasn't a throwaway at allbut....it was, the only reason you used araquanid in gen 7 was to set up webs, and then go to the mons that actually take advantage of webs.
i literally don't have any idea what distinction you're even trying to make here, or how you're remotely defining 'throwaway', if you're implying ribombee or shuckle (lol) were dead weight outside of webs, they weren't?
>since as I already explained to someone else,unfinished sentence, but it didn't make sense anyway.
>from looking at them as anything but whole vs. whole.because it's retarded to compare them in any other way?
as
>>43575780 said you COULD compare certain mons in certain ways, but it's arbitrary and meaningless for discussion, and on top of that you've outright tried to (incorrectly) claim araquanid was a big water sweeper several times in this discussion. don't lie, i can scroll up.
>you have to say "end of gen 7"would "every month after the first up to the end of gen 7" have worked better, cuck?
>can be so up in arms about saying Dracovish powercreeps Araquanidbecause it's incorrect and because you're retarded
>Araquanid's Liquidation does in fact hit harder than both Azumarill's Liquidation and Crawdaunt's Liquidationand this does not matter in the actual meta, because A. crawdaunt runs crabhammer, B. setup, better typing and dual stabs are firmly better.
you're also tying back a minor point of this discussion to its forefront, because you're a cuck who can't debate actual points so you resort to blatant misinterpretation, me saying crawdaunt outclassed araquanid in gen 7 was the reason why people realized araquanid was better off as an SW abuser, and what araquanid became is wholly different to the type of niche dracovish, crawdaunt, and azumarill fill.
tl;dr stop being a pedantic autist
